More than two decades building, selling, and delivering complex broadcast and media systems — from Navy transmitter sites to federal ST 2110 facilities. In 2026 I founded Broadcast Design Professionals, an independent consultancy built on one premise: architecture should reflect what a team can actually build, test, and operate — not what a sales pipeline needs it to be.
Most broadcast practices separate the people who design from the people who deliver. That gap is where projects fail. Scope assumptions collide with field reality, and no one owns the space in between.
Broadcast Design Professionals exists to close it: independent design and engineering consulting for ST 2110, SDI, and hybrid broadcast infrastructure, with no hardware or integration hours to sell — so the recommendation fits the facility, not a pipeline.
As founder and principal, I provide system architecture, facility and infrastructure design, standards and compliance review, integration oversight through commissioning, and independent design review for federal and commercial broadcast programs.
The objective is the same one that drove twenty years inside integrators and government programs: architecture that survives contact with the field.
Full bio →
I grew up in Phoenix in circumstances that required resilience early — stability was not given, it had to be built. With college financially out of reach, the military became the most practical path forward: structure, skills, and a way to build something on solid ground.
The Navy became the turning point. I spent seventeen years as an Interior Communications Electrician, ultimately serving as a Chief Petty Officer — coordinating maintenance for a 132-member Combat Systems Department aboard USS Enterprise (CVN-65), then overseeing 24,000+ interior communications systems aboard USS Bataan (LHD-5). That experience shaped how I think about engineering and leadership: systems only work when the people responsible for them are trained, accountable, and aligned around the mission.
During my Navy career I was first exposed to broadcast technology through Armed Forces Network, which later led to work at the Defense Information School developing and delivering broadcast engineering curriculum. After leaving active duty I transitioned into the commercial broadcast industry, applying the same systems-focused discipline to the design and integration of production infrastructure for commercial media organizations and federal agencies.
Over time my role expanded beyond engineering into system architecture and technical strategy. I have worked across the full lifecycle of complex media systems — design, pre-sales architecture, executive technical briefings, and project delivery. One of the most significant programs I led was the broadcast modernization initiative for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the largest integration project ever delivered by CHESA. I initially led the system architecture and later transitioned into delivery leadership to ensure the project was executed according to the design.
In August 2026 I left CHESA to found Broadcast Design Professionals, an independent broadcast systems design and engineering consultancy. The decision came down to the same gap I spent years trying to close from inside an integrator: design and delivery too often sit on opposite sides of a sales relationship. BDP carries no hardware or integration hours to sell — the recommendation is built to fit the facility, not a pipeline.
The environments I came up in, the years spent in the Navy, and the systems I have helped build have all reinforced the same principle: complex systems succeed when they are approached with discipline, accountability, and a clear understanding of how every part fits together. That principle is now the whole practice, not just my role inside one.
20+ years spanning the U.S. Navy, broadcast operations, facility design, federal programs, and engineering leadership.
It built over time, and it came from all directions at once. The Navy gave me my first real education in leadership. A Chief Petty Officer earns authority. It isn't inherited. I watched good chiefs lead from the front, absorbing organizational friction so their sailors could focus, developing people even when it cost them short-term, and holding accountability upward instead of pushing pressure downward. I also watched the other kind. That contrast was instructive.
Later, managing engineers, I learned something the Navy had hinted at but civilian work made undeniable: authority without service is just pressure. You can get compliance through positional power. You can't get excellence that way. Engineers do their best work when they trust their leader, when ambiguity is managed above them rather than handed down, and when the environment is stable enough for them to think clearly.
I've also been on the receiving end of leadership that didn't work, managed in ways that made good work harder, not easier. That experience shaped a commitment I return to consistently: I will not be that leader. The standard I hold myself to is whether my team is better positioned to succeed because of what I do, not in spite of it.
None of this is abstract. It shows up in specific decisions: taking the heat when a scope call goes wrong rather than redirecting it to engineers who executed in good faith. Advocating for someone's growth even when keeping them comfortable is easier. Saying no to a proposal commitment that would set my team up to fail. These aren't grand gestures. They're the daily work of leadership done right.
The conviction also has roots that predate my engineering career. In the Navy, I led the Multicultural Committee aboard ship, providing guidance, education, and perspective to more than 5,000 sailors and Marines. That work had nothing to do with systems or technology. It was entirely about showing up for people, understanding where they came from, and creating an environment where everyone could contribute fully. That's the same thing I try to do now, just in a different context.
These aren't values statements. They're the operational commitments I hold myself accountable to as an engineering leader.
External references that corroborate the work — case studies, talks, and practitioner writing.
Whether you're evaluating a broadcast infrastructure program, need an independent design review, or want to discuss a technical challenge — I'm glad to engage. For consulting engagements, reach me directly through Broadcast Design Professionals.